Bloomberg Story from another planet: Bond Yields Showing No Economic Spoils for Republicans in 2010

Trying out the WordPress app for my iPad. Came across the below story on Bloomberg. Not sure what to say. I try to keep objective but this story seems to be written to appear objective but is anything but the case.

I will go into this later, but the yield curve is steep because the low end is pinned down by the fed, and it has an extremely high chance of flattening. And if you follow the line of reasoning of the story, I think you have a decent chance of decreasing your net worth.

I continue to see evidence of an extremely unstable market with little volume. Stocks on a valuation basis don’t look so bad if we didn’t have serious deflationary factors. However we *do* in fact have serious deflationary factors as evidenced by the recent enormous flattening of the yield curve. Indeed one wonders if the writer of the story has looked at the recent price action on the five and ten year treasuries. Very unhealthy indeed!

Will try to update when I get time. In the meantime….

Try not to lose money.

Arthur O’Keefe, São Paulo Value

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-22/bonds-showing-no-economy-spoils-for-republicans-as-rates-point-to-recovery.html

Bloomberg News, sent from my iPad.

Bond Yields Showing No Economic Spoils for Republicans in 2010

Aug. 23 (Bloomberg) — Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich says Barack Obama’s policies are “artificially extending the recession.” Congressman John Boehner, the party’s leader in the House, says “stimulus policies aren’t working.” Republican Senator Jim Bunning calls Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s tenure “a failure.”

The U.S. bond market disagrees. The economy has never contracted with the difference between short- and long-term Treasury yields as wide as it is now. That gap, at 2.11 percentage points for 2- and 10-year notes, signals a 15.5 percent chance of a recession in the next year, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

“Reports of the death of the recovery are greatly exaggerated,” said Andrew Busch, a public policy strategist at Bank of Montreal’s BMO Capital Markets in Chicago and former adviser to Republican presidential candidate John McCain and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner.

As politicians step up their rhetoric ahead of the November midterm elections, bond traders are watching the so-called yield curve for clues to the direction of the economy because before each of the last seven economic contractions, long-term yields fell below short-term debt. While that gap has narrowed since reaching a record 2.91 percentage points in February, it’s still almost double the average since 1990.

Though economists are paring their forecasts, they still predict growth in gross domestic product of 3 percent this year and 2.8 percent in 2011, according to the median of 66 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. economists say most of the sectors that drag down an economy, including housing, employment and capital spending, have “already suffered big hits.”

No Double Dip

“As signs of slower U.S. growth have multiplied, market participants have become worried about the possibility of a double-dip recession,” the firm’s economists wrote in an Aug. 12 report. “The probability is unusually high – between 25 percent and 30 percent – but we do not see double dip as the base case.”

The yield on the two-year notes due in July 2012 fell to a record low of 0.4547 percent last week, as investors pushed the price of the security up 2/32, or 63 cents per $1,000 face amount, to 100 8/32. The yield on the benchmark 10-year note, a 2.625 percent security due in August 2020, declined to as low as 2.53 percent, the lowest since March 2009.

The $8.18 trillion market for Treasuries, which help determine the cost of funds for everything from mortgages to corporate bonds, has returned 8.05 percent this year, including reinvested interest, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show. They lost 3.7 percent in 2009.

‘Policies Aren’t Working’

Republicans, who lost control of the House of Representatives and Senate in 2006, are pointing to rising demand for bonds, falling yields and faltering stocks as a sure sign the economy is poised to contract. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index is down 3.9 percent this year.

It is time for Obama to “face up to the fact that his stimulus policies aren’t working,” Boehner of Ohio said Aug. 7, a day after the government reported the unemployment rate held at 9.5 percent in July.

The White House hasn’t made much progress in selling the stimulus spending to voters. Asked how their opinion of the programs had changed in recent months, respondents to a Bloomberg National Poll were divided almost evenly among those who say they had become more supportive, those who are less supportive and those who haven’t changed their view.

‘We’ve Gotten Through’

A steep yield curve traditionally indicates economic growth as investors demand more compensation for the risk of faster inflation. A flatter yield curve signals contraction and little threat of inflation.

Though yields are hovering near record lows, the curve as measured by projections of the three-month Treasury bill rate to 10-year note yield suggest the economy will strengthen by about 1.14 percent over the next year, according to a July report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

“The growth trajectory in the economy is sluggish, but positive, with no contraction on the horizon” said Wan-Chong Kung, a money manager who helps invest $89 billion at FAF Advisors in Minneapolis. “We’ve gotten through a really tough downturn in the economy. It could have been much worse if we didn’t have the type of policy that was put in place on the fiscal and monetary front that.”

Inverted Yield Curve

There have been 33 official recessions since 1850, and only three times has the economy fallen back into negative growth within a year, according to data at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

The difference between 2- and 10-year yields is up from negative 0.19 percentage point in December 2006, just before the economy began to shrink.

An inverted yield curve has twice failed to predict a recession — in late 1966 and late 1998. The bears say bonds may be sending another “false positive.” With the Fed’s target rate for overnight loans between banks at a record low of zero to 0.25 percent, it may be impossible for long-term yields to fall below short-term debt.

“As long as the Fed continues with ultra easy policy the yield curve’s relative importance as an economic signal is diminished,” said Christopher Sullivan, who oversees $1.6 billion as chief investment officer at United Nations Federal Credit Union in New York.

A gradual recovery may not be enough to bolster Democrats in the November elections, BMO’s Busch said. “The number one thing on voters’ minds are still jobs, and we haven’t seen any significant progress on the employment front.”

Signs of Improvement

Since the stimulus legislation was approved in February 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate has climbed to 9.5 percent in July from 8.2 percent. The administration projects the jobless rate will average 9.7 percent for the year. Spending by consumers has slowed, with the savings rate rising to 6.4 percent in June, from 1.7 percent in August 2007.

There are signs of improvement, as production in the U.S. rose more than forecast in July. Production at factories, mines and utilities climbed 1 percent, twice the median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey, figures from the Fed showed last week.

Companies in the U.S. added workers in July for a seventh straight month as private payrolls that exclude government agencies rose by 71,000 after a June gain of 31,000, Labor Department figures showed. Corporate spending on equipment and software jumped at a 22 percent annual rate last quarter, the biggest increase since 1997, signaling confidence among company executives.

‘The Facts’

“There seems to be a doom and gloom out there,” Doug Oberhelman, chief executive officer of Peoria, Illinois-based Caterpillar Inc., the world’s largest maker of construction equipment, told analysts in a meeting at the New York Stock Exchange on Aug. 19. “We just don’t see it that way for lots of reasons. The facts aren’t bad in our business.”

The more than 75 percent of the companies in the S&P 500 that reported second-quarter profits exceeded the average analyst estimate since July 12, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Earnings will rise 36 percent this year, the most since 1988, forecasts show. Following the 2001 recession, income growth never exceeded 20 percent.

“The main difference between 2008 and now is that corporations are making money,” said Andrew Brenner, managing director at Guggenheim Capital Markets LLC, a New-York based brokerage for institutional investors.

Not Japan

As earnings rise, companies are cutting their interest expense. The 10 lowest-yielding U.S. corporate bond deals ever were sold in the past 14 months, according to Deutsche Bank AG. Armonk, New York-based International Business Machines Corp. issued $1.5 billion of 1 percent three-year notes on Aug. 2, the lowest coupon on record for that maturity.

The bond market is saying that it may be years before the Fed raises rates to foster the recovery, said Carl Lantz, head of interest-rate strategy in New York at Credit Suisse Group AG, one of 18 primary dealers of U.S. government securities that trade with the central bank.

Slow, persistent growth will help stave off the fear that the U.S. is starting to look like Japan in the 1990s, when the Bank of Japan struggled to revive its economy amid a combination of deflation and recessions, he said.

“The economy is improving and the yield curve will stay steep as the market is pricing in a return to more normal rates further out the curve,” said Lantz. “It will feel like Japan for awhile, but ultimately we are not Japan. We are seeing subpar growth, and a muddling along that is not particularly satisfying, but we are on the path to an eventual return to normal growth.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Cordell Eddings in New York at ceddings@bloomberg.net

Find out more about Bloomberg for iPad: http://m.bloomberg.com/iphone

Sent from my iPad

How do you invest in this environment? Invest in doing something real.

Quick tactical note of how I see things panning out in the US.

Having been an options trader and having invested for a while, I have a healthy appreciation and fear of the path of an investment’s returns. AIPC which was a great investment for me by any measure promptly lost half its value before eventually assuming a path that would result in it’s being purchased for over 6 times my first buy print on the stock. Great return, tricky path. At one point the “investment” showed a -50% return. Sticking with it yielded an awesome IRR.

Which brings me to the first half subject of this note…. Do we invest thinking that this is a deflationary envrionement (forget equities and stick to fixed income) or an inflationary environment (the opposite)? Indeed, I find valid arguments from both the deflationists and the inflationists and believe both are right. How is this possible? I suspect that we will have relatively bad deflation in the US before the currency finally weakens and then leads to inflation.

Why won’t we have inflation in the short term? The quick answer is that it would solve too many problems and make life too easy. Following the principal of maximum pain, then this scenario is unlikely. What problems would inflation solve? While I am worried about the budget deficit of the US, I think there are bigger problems in the short term with the various public pensions and entitlements – social security, medicare, state and local workers – as well as a debt overhang from the housing bubble with its associated overhang on banks balance sheets. In short everyone would benefit in a situation where pensions, benefits, and debt obligations are held constant in nominal terms while we experienced a large dose of inflation. The debt load would be alleviated, and everything would strengthen.

But isn’t the US operating like Zimbabwe, you might ask? Isn’t hyperinfation just around the corner due to a currency collapse? In short no. Zimbabwe had a number of things against it. First is that the state actively destroyed production capacity by breaking up and redistributing productive farmland. Second is that it was a small component of the global export market so its sudden competitiveness due to a currency devaluation would not be noticed. Third is that there was little history of rule of law. Forth is that it has no military. Fifth is that it has a limited population base and what it does have is limited in terms of global competitiveness. There are more, but you get the idea. The US, with a currency collapse, would suddenly become a force to be reckoned with. It was once a manufacturing powerhouse, and that can indeed return with the right forces. Furthermore, all its debts are local currency denominated. Yes the US is extremely dependent on oil and would suffer greatly in the short term with a currency crash, but it’s also resilient and would eventually adapt and compete. So bottom line is that while that may eventually happen, it’s just too convenient to happen in the very short term.

So what is likely in the short term? Deflation. The exact opposite of all of the above. Possibly with global competitive currency debasement leading to very little relative devaluation perhaps. States and local municipalities finding ways to cut pensions or perhaps even worse raising taxes on others to continue paying pensions. Either way someone is going to lose purchasing power. Same deal with entitlement programs. It doesn’t look good.

This brings me to the second half of the subject. In an environment like this, where you expect things to continue to deteriorate, there are no great passive investment returns to be made. Shorting (an inherently levered strategy) will get you killed in the long term as the market experiences increased volatility and periodic rallies for whatever sane or insane reason. In the meantime the general trend will be down. To get a feel for what this looks like, look at the graph of SDS: UltraShort S&P500 ProShares (SDS) via wikiinvest:

You got the direction right but still lost money. So what’s the answer? It’s actually not so surprising or depressing. The best thing to invest in when faced with these issues is in whatever is real that you can do to keep employed, keep relavent, and keep producing something of value (which should be rewarded with money if the product is in demand).

With declining per-capita productivity (which is what you get with increasing unemployment), it’s not going to be easy. And I expect the returns for purely passive investments to decline – after all capacity utilization should decline in an environment like this, so what will “investing” pay? What investments are needed when there is steadily increasing capacity due to decline in demand? Bottom line is that it’s going to be tricky.

There’s always money to be made in dealing with short term capital crunches and by making markets where you are matching buyers and sellers, but it’s hard to make a living at that unless you are devoted to it full time. If that’s not your calling or edge, then find something that is your calling or edge that you can become an expert on and trade/get paid for other goods. Invest in yourself – your skills – and try to keep acquiring productive assets and growing your productive skill set.

This is the time for active investing – doing things like building businesses, streamlining production, and anticipating demand and meeting it.

Try not to lose money.

Arthur O’Keefe, São Paulo Value

Tony Robbins – An Important Note of Caution

I know I have fallen off the planet for the last few months, but I have been very busy getting settled in São Paulo…. I remain super bullish long-term on Brazil and see enormous opportunities here. Some of those periodically consume a lot of my time.

In any case I continue to read and analyze what’s going on. Volume in the markets has been extremely light and conditions are pretty dangerous in my opinion. Very large moves on very small volume affect asset values of enormous scale. I call that a form a leverage in the system. In a way I think it would be better if the market just remained shut rather than have +/- 2+% days on less than 200mm shares changing hands on the SPY.

I advocate running very small direction either long or short (depends on what you own or are short I suppose) in this market and keeping gross leverage low as well (gross leverage is [ABS(longs) + ABS(shorts)]/[Net Equity] where ABS is absolute value).

If you’re dying to have a position, WMT is looking pretty cheap. HPQ is as well. But hedge out some of the Beta to the market in any positions (including these). Don’t stretch at all in this market and try to get some sort of seniority in the capital structure. I think the general direction continues down in the long term. Maybe some miracle happens and the market somehow rallies, but the risk is more weighted to the downside in my opinion.

So I will leave with this video warning on the state of the market that I came across from Tony Robbins. I am trying to figure out who’s he referring to in his opening (if I do I will post an update), as he never reveals his source. I don’t think, based on the numbers that he mentioned, that his client is Paul Tudor Jones, but it sounds like someone of equal stature. What’s significant is that I have to take Tony’s claim that he is well connected at face value given what I know of him. So if he felt strongly enough to go on the record with a warning saying that his best clients are worried, especially given that Tony doesn’t need to say any of this to gain credibility, it’s worth listening to and considering. It at least adds to the body of data to be analyzed.

Take a look at this video: